Statutory Interpretation and the Human Rights Act of 1998 Essay

Statutory Interpretation and the Human Rights Act of 1998 - Essay Example fit in the research findings Mr. Mendozas application for statutory tenancy on thou of discriminatory violation of his conference Rights under hold 14 and Article 8 on the basis of his sexual orientation, had been allowed in the humiliate Courts. The European Convention guarantees fundamental human rights, including the right to privacy and freedom of sexual orientation. Any interference by public authorities therefore constitutes a violation of fundamental human rights and the right to privacy. Mr. Mendoza contended that the residence of Lords should exercise its interpretative power to read and give effect to Para on statutory rights to firebrand it compatible with Convention rights that guarantee fundamental human rights, including succession rights, which prohibit discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation.This essay declares that the Court upheld the decision on Mr. Mendozas statutory rights of tenancy, since Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights mandates that the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms in the Convention be secured without discrimination. In the case of Karner v Austria, the European Court held that there had been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken with Article 8, since the appellant was discriminated on a tenancy issue on the basis of his sexual orientation. Therefore, applying Parliament economy under the Rent Act of 1977, discriminatory aspects prohibited under Convention rights were applicable to Mendoza.