Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice Essay

Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice - Essay ExampleThe no side claims that they believe coercion exists in these types of workplaces, but working overtime is not a form of disincentive disproving Arnold and Bowies claim that it is (Sollars & Englander, 2007, p. 317). For each claim Arnold and Bowie makes towards sweatshops being inhumane, Sollars and Englander present valid counterarguments for minimum health and safeguard standards and upholding local labor laws. The claim these men make comes d aver to the right of the individual companies to set their own standards based on their companies mission rather than forcing in all companies to uphold an unattainable standard. 2. This render receives a distribute of debate for a undercoat there is no clear answer as to the manner of removing the invalidating characteristics, which make the workplace a sweatshop. Sollars and Englander make that point often in their response, there are legion(predicate) complex issues inv olved in these workplaces. In fact, the argument of Arnold and Bowie appears naive at quantify with its basis on applaud and dignity without considerations to all the figures that hinder the changes from occurring. There are many issues to trade in linguistic context wages in another country that require consideration and not all of them deal with arduous to purposely pay too little for too much work. Placing respect as the main reason for setting higher wages is not something possible in all cases and placing an arbitrary order on all MNE to pay more out of respect fails to address these issues. The first and about important factor is the costs the consumers are willing to pay for the products from the sweatshops. Yes, there are companies such as NIKE where the costs the consumers pay, considered... This issue receives a lot of debate for a reason there is no clear answer as to the manner of removing the negative characteristics, which make the workplace a sweatshop. Sollar s and Englander make that point often in their response, there are many complex issues involved in these workplaces. In fact, the argument of Arnold and Bowie appears nave at times with its basis on respect and dignity without considerations to all the factors that hinder the changes from occurring. There are many issues to address in setting wages in another country that require consideration and not all of them deal with trying to purposely pay too little for too much work. Placing respect as the main reason for setting higher wages is not something possible in all cases and placing an imperative order on all MNE to pay more out of respect fails to address these issues. The first and most important factor is the costs the consumers are willing to pay for the products from the sweatshops. Yes, there are companies such as NIKE where the costs the consumers pay, considered very high compared to another brand found in a local subtraction store. Customers are willing to pay for the na me recognition. However, NIKE addressed this issue of sweatshops but not out of respect or a desire to give their workers in these sweatshops a sense of dignity. The public outcry was passable to force them to adjust their manner of doing business.